Will the Real Gamer Please Stand Up?: Legitimacy and Gamer Culture

My dissertation examines the changing discourse over home video game usage and ownership during the first twenty-odd years of the industry.  What it means to be a video game user (for whom are video games designed and for what purposes can video games be applied) is a complex and highly contested issue.  The discourse is negotiated among a wide variety of actors, including game companies, players, and myriad actors who have never held a controller nor programmed a line of code.

An important issue that arises regarding this discourse over the meaning of video games is that of legitimacy.  Who qualifies as a real gamer and who are “fake” gamers?  Who gets to set the definition, and by what criterion should we measure whether or not someone actually is a “gamer”?  Is there a scale by which we can determine an individual or group’s “gaminess?”

The basic answer is there is no “real” gamer.  “Gamer” is a construct that changes shape depending on who is making the argument at the time.  The term has no power save that which we give it, and the image of the ideal video game player is different for everyone.   Moreover, it is an idea that is constantly being redefined over time.

However amorphous, legitimacy as an idea is an important point of discussion, and I feel we need be to better prepared to discuss legitimacy and illegitimacy among the game community as the medium moves forward, because it is constantly coming up time and again. (A related issue is the question what qualifies as a “real” game, which permeates debates over so-called “hardcore” and “casual,” and will be especially significant as app-based games continue to become more pervasive.)

As a subject of critical discussion, legitimacy can reveal a great deal about the changing discourse over the meaning of video games, both among the people who play them and the greater culture at large.  Acknowledging that we all have different personal perceptions of what it means to be a video game player  (and who we think are not real gamers) can help us better understand what we ourselves think are the important characteristics of this medium.  In turn, acknowledging that everyone’s perception of video game users is different will hopefully help us to understand the complexity of what it means to be a consumer of video games and critically examine our own preconceived notions.  This can then give us a means to measure how the medium has changed (and continues to change) over time and our relationship to it.

However, when used as a rhetorical device, legitimacy has the potential to cause great harm.  It can be used as a justification for some unsavory practices and beliefs that still have an entrenched presence in video games (i.e. sexism, racism, rape culture), allowing apologists and advocates to fall back on the argument that it’s all “part of the culture” and critics are just out to “ruin everyone’s fun.”  Legitimacy offers a means of automatically discrediting people who do not fit into the prescribed model, placing them on the outskirts of game culture (You’re not a “real” gamer, what right do you have to complain?).  This can also be accompanied by a need to protect that model of the subculture against perceived attacks against the alleged status quo from an imagined outside invader (the most sobering example of this is the vile backlash to Anita Sarkeesian’s “Tropes vs. Women” Kickstarter project).

These practices are especially apparent in debates over the role of women in video games.  As evidenced in the deluge of posts on Twitter using the #1ReasonWhy hashtag, women in video games are often left feeling on the outside looking in within their own industry (see also: here).  Women are forced to constantly justify their presence in an environment where the “real” gamer is constructed as the white heterosexual male.  The examples are too numerous to comprehensively list here; however, recent controversies surrounding Aisha Tyler’s emceeing of Ubisoft’s E3 panel (see: here and here), former Destructoid writer Ryan Perez’s sexist comments about actor and game critic Felicia Day (see: here and here), and the aforementioned firestorm surrounding Sarkeesian are just several episodes that demonstrate the contested role of women as legitimate gamers.  This issue of who is a real fan and who isn’t has also emerged in geek culture in general, as demonstrated by the controversy surrounding comic book artist Tom Harris’ recent comments that female cosplayers at conventions were pretending to be geeks in an effort to ensnare hapless (male) nerds (see also: here).

When someone invokes the “real” gamer argument, demarcating the alleged boundaries between legitimate and illegitimate gamers, we should be prepared to critically examine its usage.  Ask yourself who is making the judgment, who is deciding this person is not a real gamer, and by what criterion that person measures “true” gamers.  Only by stepping back to examine the issue can we hope to better understand it.


About kevinimpellizeri

I'm a Ph.D. candidate in history at the University of Delaware where I am studying the social and cultural impact of video games in America. When I'm not studying history or playing video games I offer my voice on 91.3 WVUD Newark and review bad horror movies at www.horrorsofhorror.com. You can follow me on Twitter at @KDImpellizeri
This entry was posted in Video Games and tagged , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to Will the Real Gamer Please Stand Up?: Legitimacy and Gamer Culture

  1. jdh5153 says:

    I just play games for fun, I don’t care what I am.


    • Franklin G. says:

      I wish there were more people who did that — just played for fun and didn’t get all bent out of shape about gender, experience level, or what constitutes a “real” gamer. I suspect there are more people out there like jdh5153 than the trolls, however the trolls are infinitely louder and very, very destructive, exclusionary, and damaging to the culture. It’s great that jdh5153 knows who he is and why he plays, but that doesn’t wipe out the issue that many women and girls who attempt to pick up video gaming as a hobby or otherwise are harassed and bullied out of the field. Time to share the toys, boys.

  2. I agree with Jdh5153, gamers as a whole need to realize that this is just a hobby and there is no need to find what a true “gamer” is. Just enjoy the games you play. But there is a lot of stupidity out there that makes us all look bad,

  3. In addition to the #1reasonwhy hashtag on Twitter there are two more that have emerged in #1reasonwhy’s wake. #1reasontobe (started by Rhianna Pratchett) aimed to give reason why there need to be more female developers, journalists, etc. and gamers, and #1reasonmentor used by female developers, journalists, etc. to connect with each other.

    While the mentality of jdh5253 would lead to much better interactions between people, labels are how people position themselves in society. While those who don’t use labels such as “hardcore” gamer, “core” gamer, or “girl” gamer (which some women use a symbol for empowering themselves as something which challenges the societal expectation of gaming culture), those who do use such labels often take pride in such labels.

    I consider myself a “hardcore” gamer. While my time to play is limited, I play to win and I play to become better. It’s not just about having fun (although when I stop having fun I usually shut the game off for at least an hour) but also about being good at what I’m passionate about.

    I think what truly needs to happen is that “hardcore” gamers, and even “core” gamers, need to accept that there are all levels of interest (just like there are all levels of interest in music) and that we should be willing to accept people into the group no matter their level of involvement. If someone enjoys watching others play video games and is enamored by such an event we should accept them in the same way that we accept people who play 15 – 20 hours of games a week.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s